Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    10:08 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: High school/Grade school > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Is it correct to Suspend a teacher with pay? Post a Reply Back to Topics
mikeangel

Rookie Author
Miami

Posts:16
Points:800
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2006 7:46:56 AM

Any teacherof being charge for anything are being suspended but being paid, that's not right
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
NintendoGas
Rookie Author Vancouver

Posts:6
Points:73,025
Joined:Jun 2012
Message Posted: Jul 17, 2012 3:36:39 PM

no lol
Profile Pic
tasha88CA
All-Star Author California

Posts:602
Points:43,315
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2012 11:08:45 PM

depends on what happen.
Profile Pic
jelman
All-Star Author Calgary

Posts:724
Points:14,260
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2012 11:27:44 AM

You are missing the point. A guy may NOT be lazy, but it may not be his choice not to work because he is accused of something that he may not be guilty of. I've seen it happen. And what? Cut him off and let him go on welfare even if he did nothing wrong? It is one thing when a verdict is proven, it is another thing when it is just alleged.
Profile Pic
jackster111
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:3,303
Points:422,635
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Mar 19, 2012 3:49:49 PM

No way, that's just getting money for being lazy, not right at all. If you are gonna earn money, work for it.
Profile Pic
kristist
Veteran Author Kansas

Posts:263
Points:39,790
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Mar 9, 2012 8:57:09 PM

NO they should not get paid while off!!
Profile Pic
daver39
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:8,319
Points:1,681,125
Joined:Jun 2003
Message Posted: Mar 2, 2012 9:31:29 AM

It would have to depend on the situation. Not all are alike.*** See Zero Tolerance postings ***



[Edited by: daver39 at 3/2/2012 9:32:11 AM EST]
Profile Pic
jelman
All-Star Author Calgary

Posts:724
Points:14,260
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 3:29:39 PM

still don't have an answer to my question, how does this person that hasn't been convicted, and may be innocent, pay their bills/mortgage and feed their family?
It is too simplistic to say that because he's not working he shouldn't be paid. I agree whole heartedly AFTER a conviction, but before, life still goes on the way it was. And sometimes it takes months before a hearing takes place.
Profile Pic
waig
Veteran Author Philadelphia

Posts:307
Points:87,965
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2012 6:53:37 PM

NO
Profile Pic
agasmiser
Champion Author Long Island

Posts:12,732
Points:2,405,020
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2012 12:49:52 PM

When anyone is suspended it should include all pay also. During a suspension that person is not working at their job. It is ludricous to pay an individual for doing nothing. Ask any taxpayer.
Profile Pic
jelman
All-Star Author Calgary

Posts:724
Points:14,260
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Feb 18, 2012 7:08:17 PM

again, as been pointed out a couple of times, how does this person that hasn't been convicted pay their bills/mortgage and feed their family?
If this happened to me, I'd have to go on welfare even though I may be completely innocent. There is a reality out there, and it costs money to live in this world.
Profile Pic
jgs818
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:2,457
Points:655,225
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Feb 18, 2012 1:43:26 PM

clearly if they are suspended or removed you shouldnt earn salary until AFTER the outcome/circumstances are found and reviewed.
Profile Pic
chas410
Sophomore Author Tulsa

Posts:215
Points:58,980
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Jan 28, 2012 2:10:30 PM

No work, No pay
Profile Pic
teacher_tim
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:15,691
Points:744,385
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 23, 2012 5:48:24 PM

no work, no pay?

Then reassign that teacher to a Central Office job until the matter is investigated. If that can't be done, pay the teacher until the matter is settled.
Profile Pic
fredjara
All-Star Author California

Posts:595
Points:123,415
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Jun 16, 2011 10:00:10 PM

False accusations were brought against a teacher in a nearby town. Three girls plotted against a teacher. It went to court. One girl had a change of heart and told the truth. The charges were dismissed against the teacher, but his career was already ruined. That is absolutely UNFAIR. Our careers could be ruined at the word of a kid who for whatever reason decides he or she doesn't like you. Bottom line, a teacher or administrator should be put on admin leave with full pay until proven guilty. After all, we are in the United States, and under our Constitution, we are innocent until PROVEN guilty.
Profile Pic
teacher_tim
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:15,691
Points:744,385
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jun 16, 2011 8:51:54 AM

Having been falsely accused by three girls who were friends, and one of whom I gave a bad grade, I can categorically say that false accusations DO happen and the teacher or administrator SHOULD be paid until the situation is resolved. In my case, fortunately, an Instructional Assistant overheard the girls plotting their story and reported it to the administration before the girls did. Just imagine what might have happened had she not overheard the girls.

As an analogy, imagine that your neighbor or coworker accused you of abusing your child and you were denied access to your family or home until the case went to trial...
Profile Pic
JetManCT
Champion Author Hartford

Posts:3,610
Points:716,670
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Jun 11, 2011 2:35:08 AM

no work, no pay.
Profile Pic
magicpete
Rookie Author Ontario

Posts:30
Points:12,700
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 6, 2010 9:41:31 PM

To everyone who thinks "it depends on the situation." NO it does NOT. Regardless of the accusation, sexual misconduct, inappropriate touching or even-for the sake of argument-murder, no one should be suspended without pay on accusation alone. I am Canadian, but American laws, while different make it clear that until due process has occured and a court has released its findings, no one is guilty! So what if the teacher is paid full salary while on forced leave? He has done nothing wrong so he should not suffer any repecussion at all-yet. If,after due process the accused is found guilty,the Board is of course right to fire him and write off the extra salary as a "the price of democracy and rule of law." End of story.
If we want the students we teach (I am a retired teacher) to respect the law,we have to show them how it works. This is how it works in both the US and Canada.
Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:5,521
Points:980,405
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 3, 2010 5:14:29 AM

It depends on the circumstances, and I believe this should be the case regardless of the profession or career, not just in education.

[Edited by: mweyant at 10/3/2010 5:14:51 AM EST]
Profile Pic
RadarIN
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:5,082
Points:1,055,020
Joined:Mar 2009
Message Posted: Sep 24, 2010 9:03:51 AM

It depends on the circumstances.
Profile Pic
bmct
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:5,930
Points:1,146,300
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2010 5:23:35 AM

I think they shpould not be paid while on suspension.
Profile Pic
magicpete
Rookie Author Ontario

Posts:30
Points:12,700
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2010 9:00:39 PM

No one in any job should be suspended without pay on an accusation alone. If one is found guilty after due process, then dismiss him or her. In teaching and other public service it's all too easy for someone with an axe to grind to make an accusation against a teacher or police officer and have him suspended.
While it is probably true that more guilty people are accused than innocent ones, the law requires due process before a vedict is rendered. Until any verdict is given, the accused deserves the benefit of the doubt and should therefore be paid. Double jeopardy is neither right nor fair.
Profile Pic
NanookAK
Champion Author Anchorage

Posts:7,235
Points:1,438,090
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Mar 26, 2010 12:48:06 PM

Depends on the circumstances.
Profile Pic
JoeTheGuyInRI
Veteran Author Rhode Island

Posts:413
Points:63,340
Joined:Jul 2005
Message Posted: Mar 25, 2010 8:54:22 PM

It depends on what the teacher did, if it was really bad, then no pay, if they haven't determined but suspended him or her, they should be paid.
Profile Pic
nags1head
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:1,811
Points:488,845
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Nov 24, 2009 11:00:12 PM

The teacher should get paid until proven guilty. If the teacher is acquited then the accuser should be sued for the money the school paid out as a result of the false accusation.



[Edited by: nags1head at 11/24/2009 11:01:22 PM EST]
Profile Pic
AnyPort
Sophomore Author Oklahoma

Posts:170
Points:16,625
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Oct 28, 2009 8:39:14 PM

DUH!!! Innocent till PROVEN guilty.
If Innocent, the accuser should be suspended.
Profile Pic
wannahybridNC
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:1,165
Points:31,290
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Aug 22, 2008 3:03:54 PM

Spendhappy,
Kids don't get suspended without just cause. They don't just suspend a kid because somebody is telling stories. Students at my school have the option to pick up their work while out on suspension so they don't fall behind. That is their option though.
Profile Pic
wannahybridNC
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:1,165
Points:31,290
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Aug 22, 2008 3:02:14 PM

As bad as it sounds, until the case is solved and the teacher is found guilty, suspended with pay is the best option. Think about what you would lose if you were suspended under false accusations. You would lose your car, your house, your bills would just not get paid. When the teacher is found to be not guilty (as it happened down here), besides the teacher's reputation, they would also lose their house, car and everything about life...all because somebody made up a story because they were mad at a particular teacher.
If they are found guilty, then the school can garnish future wages and/or sue to get their money back. The school is like the government, they won't be without their money.
So as bad as it sounds, pending a guilty verdict, the teacher should be suspended with pay in the event of a non-guilty verdict where they would not only have to build their reputation back up, but credit and everything else.
Profile Pic
soutxed
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,515
Points:2,209,940
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Aug 22, 2008 9:10:24 AM

childoftibet;

How does a teacher pay his/her bills while suspended? If a teacher is found guilty of an infraction that warrents termination, the district could sue to get the pay back. Some investigations take over a year. That is long time to go without food or utilities.
Profile Pic
irthekid
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:8,226
Points:1,816,495
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2008 12:50:58 PM

Where does a teacher who is falsely accused get his/her reputation back?
Profile Pic
spendhappy
Rookie Author Montana

Posts:8
Points:375
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2008 3:01:57 AM

DOES A STUDENT GET CREDIT FOR BEING SUSPENDED. NO!!!!!!!!!!
Profile Pic
irthekid
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:8,226
Points:1,816,495
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: Aug 11, 2008 12:18:34 PM


So what does the district do about the contract it has with the teachers? Just because you my be upset, that does not give the district the right to void the teachers contract. If the teacher is found guilty of a particular offense you will have time for your pound of flesh.
Profile Pic
childoftibet
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:1,730
Points:78,975
Joined:Jul 2008
Message Posted: Aug 11, 2008 3:23:46 AM

Suspensions should be without pay.

After investigation if the suspension has been unfounded, then the back pay should be awarded.
Profile Pic
BLUEYES1949
Rookie Author San Diego

Posts:16
Points:1,160
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Aug 7, 2008 11:46:39 PM

Why shouldn't a teacher be payed when they are suspended. You're not giving us the whole story I feel, because you seem to have a very strong opinion here.
Profile Pic
gaschecker5
Champion Author Newfoundland

Posts:6,781
Points:2,175,265
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Jul 22, 2008 6:37:25 AM

They should be paid when suspended. Just because they are accused of something does not mean they are guilty. When guilt has been established it is of course a different story.
Profile Pic
design_guy06
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:7,606
Points:1,615,095
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jun 22, 2008 4:34:36 PM

If a teacher does something bad, they should be suspended without pay. That way it teaches them a lesson. This too goes for police officers or any type of job.
Profile Pic
Lander02
Sophomore Author Twin Cities

Posts:138
Points:53,570
Joined:Mar 2007
Message Posted: Jun 16, 2008 12:57:35 AM

mikeangel, have you thought this through completely? What if someone accused you of something. Your employer would probably need to suspend you until it had been resolved. Does that mean you should lose your pay because someone may have been mad at you and pulled a dumb joke? I hate to say it, but sometimes kids have tried to "get back" at their teachers for giving them a poor grade or reprimanding them in class. While this is not always the case, would it not be better to err on the side of Due Process? Let's not make hasty judgments. After all, people are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.
Profile Pic
C4U
Champion Author Salt Lake City

Posts:9,194
Points:1,791,605
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Jun 12, 2008 12:38:26 AM

Sounds like individual feel that if a teacher is falsely accused of something they should lose their daily pay for the time they were falsely accused. (I am not talking about teachers that have been deemed doing something that is agaisnt the law or policy)

Gee, I guess based upon these premises then anybody that is accused of something should be sent home with out pay, reguardless if they did it or not!

I think this is called "Due Process" and employees are entitled this as part of their rights. Due process is in most policy and procedures manuals for most jobs.
Profile Pic
irthekid
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:8,226
Points:1,816,495
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: May 17, 2008 7:45:18 AM



A teacher would be something academic in nature and not competing with administrators for "desk space."
Profile Pic
soutxed
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,515
Points:2,209,940
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: May 16, 2008 8:48:15 AM

In our district, they usually are sent home. They are too many administrators doing "desk duty" for teachers to fill.
Profile Pic
irthekid
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:8,226
Points:1,816,495
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: May 15, 2008 10:01:30 AM

It also depends upon what the local laws are and what the teacher contract says.
Profile Pic
teacher_tim
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:15,691
Points:744,385
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: May 14, 2008 1:39:30 PM

Suspended with pay is not a "paid vacation". Teachers are reassigned to non-teaching duties, where they do not interact with children, much like a police officer getting "desk duty" while an investigation is made for an officer-involved shooting.
Profile Pic
saolah
Champion Author Delaware

Posts:2,382
Points:489,545
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Dec 15, 2007 4:34:37 PM

If the Board Of Ed. Pays a teacher it should be at Half pay
Profile Pic
saolah
Champion Author Delaware

Posts:2,382
Points:489,545
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Dec 15, 2007 4:33:15 PM

No they should not get paid!!!!!
Profile Pic
soutxed
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,515
Points:2,209,940
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Nov 27, 2007 9:08:51 AM

What unproven offense would be included in suspension without pay?
Profile Pic
design_guy06
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:7,606
Points:1,615,095
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Nov 24, 2007 8:53:09 PM

Depends on what the offense is.
Profile Pic
Chazzer
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:16,231
Points:3,330,555
Joined:May 2002
Message Posted: Oct 7, 2007 12:03:21 PM

It depends what the offense is.
Profile Pic
soutxed
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,515
Points:2,209,940
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Jun 27, 2007 9:48:54 AM

owt

Who pays the bills for the suspended teacher in the mean time? Some of these "investigations" can take up to a year.
Profile Pic
owt
Champion Author Tennessee

Posts:10,284
Points:1,591,430
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jun 25, 2007 4:50:20 PM

It is just a paid vacation. Anyone suspended (my opinion) should be without pay and if proven not quilty-pay them the back pay.
Profile Pic
soutxed
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,515
Points:2,209,940
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Apr 18, 2007 10:35:02 AM

Slightly related to the topic is what recently happened to the Duke LaCrosse team. Charges were made and a rouge prosecutor continued to investigate and hide evidence. These poor guys lost a year of schooling and their reputations have been ruined.

A student (or parent) can make charges and even if proven false, that reputation may or may not be the same. The least a district can do is pay them.

bryceisright--I thought that a government had to prove guilt, not a teacher (or anyone else) had to prove innocence.
Profile Pic
pkhdonovan
Champion Author Maine

Posts:11,991
Points:2,701,905
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2007 3:04:34 PM

Its okay, but if the teacher is found guilty they should repay the money.
Post a reply Back to Topics